Unlocking Aotearoa’s AI opportunity: TUANZ calls for trust, transparency and human oversight 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
14 July 2026

The Tech Users Association of New Zealand (TUANZ) is urging a focused approach to the responsible use of generative AI, highlighting trust, transparency and human oversight as critical to unlocking its full value. With AI projected to contribute up to $76 billion to New Zealand’s economy  by 2038, TUANZ says realising this opportunity will depend on building and maintaining public trust. , 

As part of its 2026 policy programme, TUANZ today released its Responsible Generative AI position paper. The paper recognises strong early adoption across Aotearoa, while making it clear that sustained progress will rely on how effectively risks are managed and confidence is built. 

“AI presents a significant opportunity for New Zealand to lift productivity and strengthen our global competitiveness,” says Paul Littlefair, Chair of TUANZ. “Adoption is already underway, but trust will determine how far and how fast we can go.” 

While many New Zealanders are engaging with AI-enabled services, confidence remains uneven. Concerns around fairness, transparency and data use continue to shape willingness to adopt, and small businesses risk being left behind, with many yet to move from awareness to practical implementation. 

TUANZ’s position is that New Zealand’s competitive edge lies not just in adopting AI, but in becoming a trusted and responsible user of it. 

“We have an opportunity to lead not through scale, but through trust,” Littlefair says. “That means ensuring AI systems are transparent, accountable, and designed around people.” 

From principles to practical safeguards 

To support responsible adoption and build confidence in AI, TUANZ is calling for four priority areas:

  • Invest in our own AI capabilities: While supporting global tech investment, the Government must be brave and invest in New Zealand’s own AI capabilities, including providing state-backed AI services to ensure our domestic research sector remains globally competitive.
  • Mandate “Algorithmic Explainability” for High-Stakes Uses: Transition from soft law principles to targeted regulatory interventions. Organisations using AI for life-impacting decisions, such as banking or health, must provide clear, non-technical explanations of the logic used, ensuring no decision is hidden inside a “black box”.
  • Establish a National “Human-in-the-Loop” Standard: With 74% of Kiwis feeling more comfortable with AI when they know a human can step in, industry standards must guarantee seamless escalation pathways to human support. This ensures human oversight is always available to correct biased outputs or AI “hallucinations”.
  • Launch an “AI Readiness” Resource Hub for SMEs: To bridge the adoption gap, TUANZ offers to work collaboratively with the Government and other AI related groups to compile a practical toolset and webinar series specifically for SMEs, helping them move from hesitation to responsible implementation.

Building trust to unlock growth

TUANZ emphasises that responsible AI is not simply about managing risk, it is a key enabler of economic participation, innovation and long-term growth.

“Trust is fundamental to the success of AI,” says Littlefair. “When people and businesses feel confident in how these systems operate, they are more likely to adopt them, invest in them, and realise their full value.” 
“Getting this right positions New Zealand to capture the benefits of AI in a way that is inclusive, credible and aligned with our values.”

ENDS

Media Contact: Michelle Park on behalf of Paul Littlefair, Chair, TUANZ

Notes to the Editor: This media release marks Week 5 of the TUANZ Policy Release Plan, focusing on the AI opportunity versus the trust gap. Over the final week of the rollout, TUANZ will release its concluding position paper covering Access and Inclusion for all of Aotearoa.

Strengthening trust through transparency: TUANZ calls for a shift to “active agency” in data use.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
7 July 2026

The Tech Users Association of New Zealand (TUANZ) is calling for a step-change in how organisations manage and use data, urging a move from passive consent models to a more transparent, 

As part of its 2026 policy programme, TUANZ today released its Transparent Data Use position paper statement. The paper recognises the strong foundations New Zealand has established, while making a clear case for the next phase: enabling individuals to actively understand and control how their data is used. 

“New Zealand has taken important steps to strengthen digital trust,” says Paul Littlefair, Chair of TUANZ. “Recent updates to the  Privacy Act and the introduction of the Consumer Data Right are improving transparency and giving people more control. But as data use accelerates, particularly with the growth of AI, expectations are rising just as quickly.” 

Recent insights point to both opportunity and risk:

  • Most New Zealanders are now knowingly engaging with AI-enabled services
  • Strong data privacy expectations remain high
  • Trust is increasingly a deciding factor in whether people engage with organisations and new technologies 

TUANZ’s view is that trust cannot rely on long, complex privacy policies or one-off consent. Instead, organisations need to adopt a model of active and informed agency, where people clearly understand how their data is used, and can make meaningful choices in real time. 

“Organisations must move from viewing themselves as owners of data, to acting as kaitiaki, trusted stewards.” Littlefair says. “That means no surprises, clear communication and putting people in control.” 

Shifting from compliance to confidence 

To support a more transparent and trusted data environment, TUANZ is calling for four priority actions: 

  • Mandate “Algorithmic Clarity” for High-Stakes Decisions: The Government and industry must adopt a standard for Explainable AI. If an algorithm makes a decision impacting a citizen’s life, such as credit or insurance, the organisation must provide a clear, non-technical explanation of the logic used, eliminating “black box” systems.
  • Adopt Standardised “Data Nutrition Labels”: To combat confusing “wall of text” privacy policies, New Zealand should develop visual, standardised labels that allow consumers to compare data practices at a glance. This includes notices presented exactly when the data is requested.
  • Enable True Individual Control (Self-Sovereignty): Expand the Consumer Data Right beyond the banking and electricity sectors so users can safely share their data with third parties to get better deals. Furthermore, universal “Opt-Out” signals must be introduced to allow users to easily withdraw consent across platforms.
  • Uphold Māori Data Sovereignty: Ensure our data landscape honours Te Tiriti o Waitangi by implementing Ngā Tikanga Paihere (guidelines for ethical data use). Data use must respect the mana and dignity of individuals, and Māori data must be subject to Māori governance.

Enabling a high-trust, high-growth digital economy 

TUANZ emphasises that transparent data use is not simply a compliance issue, its a key enabler of innovation, productivity and international competitiveness. 

“Trust is a critical driver of digital adoption,” says Littlefair. “When people understand and feel confident in how their data is used, they are far more likely to engage, share and adopt new technologies. That creates the conditions for innovation and growth.” 

ENDS

Media Contact: Michelle Park for Paul Littlefair, Chair, TUANZ

Notes to the Editor: This release forms part of  TUANZ’s policy rollout, focused on strengthening trust, transparency and participation in New Zealand’s digital economy. The Transparent Data Use position paper is the fourth in a series of weekly releases covering key digital priorities for Aotearoa. 

Securing Aotearoa’s digital future: TUANZ Calls for “security by design” and stronger system accountability.

MEDIA RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

30 June 2026

The Tech Users Association of New Zealand (TUANZ) is urging a shift to a more proactive and enforceable approach to cyber security, warning that current settings place too much responsibility on individuals and small businesses to manage increasingly complex digital risks. 

As part of its 2026 policy programme, TUANZ today released its Trust and Safety position paper, alongside a discussion paper on social media age assurance. Together, they set out a clear direction: New Zealand must move beyond a “user beware” mindset and embed “security by design” across digital systems.

“New Zealand has made real progress in strengthening its cyber defences,” says Paul Littlefair, Chair of TUANZ. “Better coordination through the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and  initiatives like Malware Free Networks are delivering results. But the threat environment is evolving quickly, and our response needs to keep pace.” 

Recent data highlights both progress and pressure:

  • Significant disruption of malicious cyber activity across national networks
  • Tens of millions of dollars in harm avoided to critical organisations
  • At the same time, escalating scam losses and declining confidence among small businesses 

With New Zealanders losing an estimated $200 million annually to scams, TUANZ warns that the rapid advancement of generative AI is amplifying risks. Sophisticated, highly personalised attacks are becoming easier to execute, and harder for individuals to identify. 

This is creating a growing equity gap, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), many of whom lack the capability and resources to keep up. A rising proportion of smaller organisations now report their cyber resilience as insufficient.

“Expecting individuals and small businesses to carry the burden of managing these risks is no longer tenable,” Littlefair says. “We need to design systems that are secure by default, not secure only for those with the time, expertise or resources to protect themselves.” 

From individual responsibility to system accountability 

TUANZ’s position is clear: improving digital trust requires a shift in where responsibility sits, from users to the systems and platforms they rely on.

To support this, TUANZ is calling for four priority actions:

  • Develop an Enforceable National Cyber Security Approach: Transition from voluntary guidelines to enforceable legislation, including mandatory reporting for major cyber-attacks and enhanced capabilities for agencies to investigate and prosecute global cybercriminals targeting New Zealanders.
  • Close the SME Gap with “Cyber Health Incentives”: Bridge the equity gap by introducing tax rebates or direct grants for SMEs to adopt essential security “hygiene,” such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) and secure cloud backups.
  • Mandate Platform and Provider Accountability: Enact regulation that requires telecommunications and social media platforms to proactively detect and block fraudulent activity and deepfakes, shifting the burden of identifying AI-generated scams away from the individual user.
  • Embed Cyber Safety as a Core Life Skill: Treat digital literacy with the same importance as reading and mathematics by mandating technology upskilling in the school curriculum, ensuring the next generation enters the workforce protected and prepared.

Supporting a balanced national conversation on online safety. 

Alongside the Trust and Safety paper, TUANZ has released a discussion paper, Navigating the Social Media Age-Gating Debate, to help inform policy development in a fast-moving and highly contested area. 

Rather than advocating a single solution, the paper sets out key principles to guide decision-making, including proportionality, practicality, privacy and equity. It also highlights the trade-offs inherent in age assurance approaches and the importance of grounding policy in evidence. 

“This is a complex issue with no simple answers,” Littlefair says. “What matters is that we have a clear, informed national conversation – and that we don’t default to solutions that shift responsibility back onto families without addressing system-level risks.”

Enabling growth through trust 

TUANZ emphasises that strengthening trust and safety is not only a defensive priority, but a critical enabler of growth. 

“Trust is fundamental to digital adoption,” says Littlefair. “If people don’t feel safe online, they will not fully engage with new technologies, including AI. Getting this right supports innovation, productivity, and the long-term competitiveness of our digital economy.” 

ENDS

Media Contact: Michelle Park on behalf of Paul Littlefair, Chair, TUANZ

Notes to the Editor: This release formed part of  TUANZ’s 2026 policy rollout, focused on strengthening New Zealand’s digital resilience and trust settings. The Trust and Safety position paper and accompanying discussion paper on social media age assurance are available as part of this programme below. 

Building Aotearoa’s digital workforce critical to unlocking AI-led growth.

The Tech Users Associate of New Zealand (TUANZ) is calling for urgent, coordinated investment in home-grown digital capability to ensure Aotearoa can capture the significant economic opportunity presented by artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. 

New Zealand’s technology sector is already the country’s second-largest export earner, generating more than $17 billion annually. TUANZ says sustaining and growing that contribution will depend on addressing widening skills gaps and strengthening the pipeline from education to employment. ,  As part of its 2026 Position Papers programme, TUANZ has today released its Education to Employment policy statement. The paper sets out a pathway to build a more skilled and inclusive digital workforce, with a focus on developing talent domestically rather than relying on offshore supply. 

“We have strong foundations, including high levels of digital adoption and early uptake of AI,” says Craig Young, CEO of TUANZ. “However, demand for advanced digital skills continues to outpace supply. Without a more deliberate approach to building capability, we risk limiting the economic and productivity gains available to New Zealand.” 

The paper highlights the need to view capability as a lifelong pathway, from early education through to workforce participation, and outlines four priority actions for  Government and industry:

  • Mandate Technology Upskilling in the Core Curriculum: Elevate digital literacy to the same status as reading and mathematics, embedding essential digital skills from primary through secondary school to ensure every student is “digital-ready”.
  • Incentivise “Home-Grown” Capability and Digital Apprenticeships: Expand industry-led reskilling programmes by providing tax credits or subsidies to businesses that invest in internal academies to train junior talent, particularly in regional areas and “deep tech” fields.
  • Encourage Diverse Pathways: Take the lead in developing career pathways that dismantle cultural barriers and actively encourage Māori, Pasifika, and Wahine into tech education and roles, ensuring our digital workforce represents our population.
  • Close the SME Digitalisation Gap: Provide government-backed financial incentives to lower the barrier to entry for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) – the backbone of our economy – so they can improve their digital skills and cyber security defences.

“The transition from education to meaningful digital employment is a critical lever for  New Zealand’s long-term prosperity,” Young says. “Targeted investment in local capability will strengthen productivity, support economic resilience, and ensure more New Zealanders can participate in the opportunities ahead.”

To read the full position statement click here.

ENDS

Building on Strong Foundations: TUANZ calls for cross-party tech strategy to unlock Aotearoa’s digital future

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

16 June 2026

Building on Strong Foundations: TUANZ calls for cross-party tech strategy to unlock Aotearoa’s digital future

Aotearoa New Zealand has the talent, capability  and infrastructure to be a leading digital nation. But realising this potential will require a clear, long-term technology strategy that endures beyond electoral cycles, says the Tech Users Association of New Zealand (TUANZ).

Today, TUANZ begins releasing its 2026 Position Papers – Unlocking Aotearoa’s Digital Potential – setting out a practical roadmap to lift New Zealand’ back into the top tier of digital economies. 

TUANZ Chief Executive Craig Young says the opportunity is significant, but the current approach is holding the country back. 

“Technology can make New Zealand a better place – growing our economy, strengthening our communities and improving everyday life,” says Young.

“We have strong foundations, from world-class connectivity to a more renewable energy system. But to translate this into global leadership requires a more coordinated and long-term approach.”

Young says the key issue is not capability, but consistency. “Investment in technology and digital transformation doesn’t operate on three-year political cycles, and neither should our national approach. Without long-term certainty, we risk underinvesting and falling behind.”

Over the coming weeks, TUANZ will release detailed policy papers focused on five priority areas critical to New Zealand’s digital future: 

  • Education to Employment: building the skills for a digital future.
  • Trust and Safety: creating a secure, resilient digital environment.
  • Transparent Data Use: strengthening trust through clarity and control.
  • Responsible Generative AI: enabling safe, trusted adoption of emerging technologies.
  • Access and Inclusion: ensuring equitable connectivity and opportunity.

“Our members are clear: what’s needed now is certainty, coordination, and commitment,” says Young. “We are calling on political leaders to work across party lines to deliver a long-term digital strategy that matches the scale of the opportunity.”

TUANZ will continue to represent the voice of digital users, advocating for outcomes that ensure every New Zealander can participate in, and benefit from, a thriving digital future.

Digital Technology Workforce Development Submission 2025

IT Professionals and TUANZ have developed a joint submission on the latest moves in the reshpe ofg vocational training in NZ.  In the submission we advocate for the digital technology sector’s unique needs within Aotearoa’s vocational education reforms. We favour an independent work-based learning model to ensure industry control and agility in training. The submission emphasises the importance of a dedicated Digital Technology Industry Skills Board (ISB) to prevent digital skills from being overshadowed by other industries. It calls for funding and support for cadetships and micro-credentials aligning with modern tech employment, rather than solely relying on traditional apprenticeships. The submission stresses the need for government investment in digital technology skills to future-proof New Zealand’s workforce. Finally, we offer their expertise to ensure that the vocational education reform benefits the digital technology sector.

You can read the submission here.

Will we see the return of the cosy duopoly?

The government is gearing up to sell management rights to the 700MHz spectrum in the next few months and hopefully we’ll see LTE mobile service deployed throughout the country in the not too distant future.

The auction itself is key to the future of the mobile telco sector in New Zealand and there are a couple of worrying signs in the information that’s been released so far.

All together we’re looking at 45MHz in total. We have three mobile operators so that would be three lots of 15MHz each. Nice and simple, it means we have equal opportunity for mobile network deployments and each network operator will be able to offer the same level of throughput as the other operators.

However, that doesn’t take into account the technology itself. LTE is clever stuff and will allow network operators to combine together spectrum from a variety of different bands to create a massive network with potential for hundreds of megabits per second.

If that’s to happen, we need to address ownership of all available spectrum, not just the 700MHz spectrum in isolation.

What really worries me, however, is the note in the press release that says the 700MHz spectrum will indeed be sold off in 5MHz blocks with no operator able to buy more than 15MHz. Unless there’s a lack of interest, in which case the Ministry may increase that limit to 20MHz.

Two operators with 20MHz and a third with nothing or at best 5MHz would destroy our newly emerging mobile network competitive market.

For too long we struggled with a cosy duopoly in our mobile market. Two players does not make for a dynamic market – it makes for a carefully managed, steady-as-she-goes, don’t rock the boat approach to pricing and services. It’s natural, it’s what happens in every industry and it’s entirely hopeless.

Today we have three network operators with two and a half networks. If we want to ensure a three player market in 4G (something the Aussies have already got wrong) then we have to ensure the auction is conducted in such a way as to make that a priority.

I know Treasury thinks it can make a windfall from the auction. I know the government will, in these difficult economic times, be eager for a boost to the coffers from those greedy telcos. But the true economic impact comes later, once the networks are deployed. It’s only then, when we have competition and capability, that we see the benefits such deployment can bring. The government itself acknowledges that – now it must manage the bean counters to make sure they don’t get too carried away with dollar signs in their eyes.

I’d go so far as to simply offer up the spectrum at no cost. Think what 2Degrees could do with its network deployment if it didn’t have to invest $100m or more in spectrum. That’s serious money for a network rollout that will bring competition to the masses.

Think I’m a Communist? We have precedent. We’re talking here about a 20 year monopoly on these spectrum lots, given away in the belief that the economic gain will be tremendous. If that sounds familiar then it should – that’s the argument the government uses to sell its Sky City convention centre deal. Why not use the same logic here?